Here at SIGNiX, a lot of people ask us why our digital signatures will hold up better in court than other electronic signatures. We could tell you, but we’d rather show you how electronic signatures have held up in the real world. Let’s take a look at the court case Adams vs. Quiksilver, Inc. (2010 Cal App. Unpub. LEXIS 1236 (Feb. 22, 2010))
In 2008, Lynn Adams applied for a job with Quiksilver. After interviews, Quiksilver told her that one of the requirements before she could be hired was passing a background check. An employee at Quiksilver emailed her a link to an online background check form asking her to review and edit the information and sign the document.
When Lynn clicked the link to open the document, she wasn’t required to create a login or authenticate herself. More concerning? The form already had her name filled out beside the sentence “By typing my name, I fully understand the above Notice and Authorization.”
Lynn testified that she never typed her name on the form. She said that someone else typed her name, essentially electronically signing the document for her.
In court, a Quiksilver employee testified that anyone who had access to the link sent to Lynn could open and edit the document. The employee also testified that two Quiksilver employees also had access to edit the document, which means any of them could have electronically signed the document.
The court found that there wasn’t enough proof to say that Lynn signed the document under California Civil Code provisions over electronic transactions, and they decided in Lynn’s favor.
To learn more about what makes a digital signature legal according to guidelines put out by the American Bar Association, download your free digital copy of our white paper.
This blog post shouldn’t be seen as legal advice. You should discuss specific issues about using digital signatures in your business with your own legal counsel and compliance officers.